Community


  Forum Tools
Forums  | Register | Login

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List | 

RE: The FDA and health

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> RE: The FDA and health
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: The FDA and health - 1/13/2009 11:29:54 AM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
I found this interesting

quote:


The Bible recommends numerous medicinal herbs for the treatment, prevention and even the cure of degenerative diseases.
...
But under FTC regulations that are in place right now, anyone selling Bibles in the same store as the herbal supplements mentioned in the Bible could be arrested, imprisoned and permanently put out of business. Their Bibles could be confiscated, their herbs destroyed and their lives ruined because they dared to sell the herbs mentioned in the Bible.


Will Bibles be banned next?

The U.S. government is really turning into a tyrannical organization in favor of the rich and the powerful.

quote:


Throughout 2008, the FTC has been on a free speech rampage, sending threatening demands to 130 companies selling dietary supplements.
...
On that last point, it's important to note that the FTC is now functioning as both Judge and Jury, as it has set up its own "private" FTC court in Washington D.C., where the right to a trial by jury does not exist, and the FTC's own appointed judges render decisions against the accused (the dietary supplement companies) without using any commonly-accepted legal standards whatsoever.
...
In its threatening letters sent to dietary supplement companies, the FTC demands that the principals of such companies appear in their own private FTC court to face charges. Failure to appear is considered an admission of guilt, causing your company to be shut down by the FDA while you're arrested and brought up on yet more federal charges.
...
NaturalNews has spoken to many companies targeted by the FTC. Nearly all of them have been too terrorized by the FTC to be willing to go on the record with an interview. Although they have all told me privately that they believe they are being targeted by a criminally-operated FTC waging an anti-health witch hunt, they are too afraid of winding up in prison to go on the record with their views.

This fact alone should cause serious concern for anyone reading this. Since when was America a country of secret regulatory police who terrorized the business community into a state of silent fear?


(same link as above)


quote:


The FTC, you see, is not merely demanding that companies remove all text from their websites that might imply an herb could be useful for preventing cancer; they are also demanding that the websites of these companies may not link OUT to other websites that contain such information (such as NaturalNews.com, for example).


This should not be tolerated, they are making it more difficult for targeted companies to say anything against the government or the rich and the powerful (ie: by preventing them from referring to naturalnews). As DayStar43 points out in post 69, this nation is quickly becoming a nation of tyranny.

< Message edited by Bettawrekonize -- 1/13/2009 11:38:13 AM >
Post #: 76
RE: The FDA and health - 1/13/2009 9:52:26 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:


The FDA...utterly fails to address the issue of financial conflicts of interests in clinical trials...

That's the conclusion from the Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). As the NY Times reported, the following disturbing facts have emerged from this HHS investigation:

In a whopping 42 percent of clinical trials used by the FDA to approve drugs and medical devices, the agency received no financial conflicts disclosure forms whatsoever. Furthermore, the FDA did nothing to address this problem. It simply allowed the lapses in disclosure to continue.

Out of the 58 percent of clinical trials in which the FDA did receive financial disclosure information, the FDA didn't even look at nearly one-third of the financial disclosure reforms, the inspector general says...

When doctors and researchers admitted serious conflicts of interest on the disclosure forms, the FDA did absolutely nothing to deal with the conflicts in 20 percent of the cases.

The NYT interviewed an FDA spokesperson who admitted on the record that the FDA does not review doctors' conflicts of interest in drug trials because, they say, the conflicts are not a sufficient source of bias to disqualify those researchers.

The NYT also reports that from 20 to 33 percent of all doctors who oversee clinical trials have financial conflicts of interest.

The FDA believes that collecting and reviewing financial disclosure information from doctors overseeing clinical trials is "not worth the effort" and really has no commitment to the process.


FDA Routinely Ignores Financial Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Trials Relied on to Approve Drugs
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28624030/

Removing conflicts of interest is worth the effort. If the FDA is to make good decisions, we need to try our best to ensure that their decisions are being made independently of conflicts of interest (and we should never assume they are being made independently of conflicts of interest).

< Message edited by Bettawrekonize -- 1/13/2009 10:17:45 PM >
Post #: 77
RE: The FDA and health - 1/13/2009 10:37:35 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:


Big pharma last week declared it will forthwith ban the long-entrenched practice of deluging physicians with office supplies, coffee mugs, golf balls, clothing and other treats bearing logos and brand names.


Studies show doctors’ free samples to patients may not be such a bargain

Wow, some good might actually come out of this mess.
Post #: 78
RE: The FDA and health - 1/19/2009 1:15:14 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
Internal Documents Suggest FDA was Lax on Device Approvals

FDA lets drugmakers advise doctors on unapproved uses

How dare dietary supplement manufacturers do something like this. The hypocrisy.

Ovation Pharmaceuticals' Sabril recommended by FDA panel despite reports of visual field defect

FDA Told to Toughen Medical Device Reviews

FDA Admits Turning Blind Eye To Doctor Pharmaceutical Relationship

The first step to correcting a problem is admitting that you have one.

Chrysalis Nutritionist Stephen Heuer Arrested by Federal Marshalls in FDA Raid

It's amazing how law abiding citizens get arrested in this country yet the criminals responsible for selling AIDS tainted blood and the U.S FDA members responsible for allowing these sales are held unaccountable.

< Message edited by Bettawrekonize -- 1/19/2009 1:22:58 PM >
Post #: 79
RE: The FDA and health - 1/19/2009 1:18:55 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:


"What in the [heck] are they thinking?" Marler told me today. "The FDA knew there was a problem on Labor Day and they wait for inaugural day to do anything."


Feds do little to determine scope of spreading peanut butter poisoning.

The FDA is too afraid to chase after huge powerful entities (so these entities must recall products themselves) because the FDA is too busy chasing after harmless, defenseless, small entities that sell dietary supplements and such.
Post #: 80
RE: The FDA and health - 1/20/2009 12:33:20 AM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:


Washington, DC - More than one third of new drug marketing applications approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were missing information about potential conflicts of interest for clinical trial investigators, which could allow bias to creep into the approvals process, a government report just released has found [1]. The FDA has said that it agrees with most of the report's findings.
...

Yet 42% of new drug marketing applications filed in fiscal year 2007 were short on investigator financial disclosures, and in fully one fifth of cases where such information was disclosed, FDA reviewers took no action, the watchdogs reported.

"In [fiscal year] 2007, only 1% of clinical investigators disclosed a financial interest," the report's authors write. "By way of comparison, the Journal of the American Medical Association reported that between 23% and 28% of academic researchers had financial interests in medical companies. Further, we found a number of limitations in FDA's oversight, leaving FDA unable to determine whether sponsors submit financial information for all clinical investigators."


http://www.theheart.org/article/935507.do
Post #: 81
RE: The FDA and health - 1/23/2009 2:45:37 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:


The Food & Drug Administration's oversight of drugs and the Environmental Protection Agency's assessment of chemicals are among the federal programs in greatest need of reform, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) says in a report released on Jan. 22.

The investigative arm of Congress, GAO added these two programs along with the regulation of U.S. financial systems to its list of some two dozen government programs at high risk for waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement. GAO updates the list every two years, when a new Congress convenes.


http://pubs.acs.org/cen/news/87/i04/8704notw10.html
Post #: 82
RE: The FDA and health - 1/27/2009 5:33:38 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
I found this interesting

quote:


First of all, it took chutspa to call it "Truvia", as if Stevia somehow isn't the real thing! Secondly, tales of Truvia™ side effects are starting to appear (link at the end of this article).

All those editorials about how wonderful it is that "Stevia is now FDA-approved" were just grossly misleading advertizements for Coca Cola's new "Stevia-sweetened" soda pop. It's a hoax, folks! And the dime-a-dozen "health sites" are taking the bait hook, line and sinker.


http://www.steviazone.org/stevia-still-banned-fda.shtml

Also, according to wikipedia

quote:


Critics note that the FDA has not actually permitted the stevia plant itself to be used as a food additive, but only the chemically-refined Reb-A extract.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stevia
Post #: 83
RE: The FDA and health - 1/28/2009 1:26:14 AM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
I found these three articles interesting.

Insider Reveals How FDA Demolished “Safe” Mercury Levels

Mercury In Vaccines Was Replaced With Something Even MORE Toxic

New York Times Exposes Vitamin D Testing Fraud

The titles of the above articles seem to be hyped up. For instance, the vitamin D "fraud" incident doesn't seem to have been deliberately committed to the detriment of the people involved, there just seems to have been some accidental laboratory results involved. Hence, it shouldn't be called a fraud, but such lab errors are something I think people should be aware of.
Post #: 84
RE: The FDA and health - 1/29/2009 1:56:25 AM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:


The government Tuesday accused the peanut butter manufacturer Peanut Corp. of America (PCA) of shipping products in 2007 and 2008 after internal tests found bacterial contamination, violating food safety regulations.

The company's actions "can only be described as reprehensible and criminal," said Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., who oversees Food and Drug Administration funding. "Not only did this company knowingly sell tainted products, it shopped for a laboratory that would provide the acceptable results they were seeking. This behavior represents the worst of our current food safety regulatory system."
...
The FDA said that its inspection of the plant found records of 12 instances in which plant officials identified salmonella in ingredients or finished products. The products should not have been shipped, the FDA says. PCA took no steps to address cleaning after finding the salmonella, says Michael Rogers, director of the FDA's division of field investigations.


Officials call for criminal probe into salmonella recall

Naturalnews (highly biased and exaggerated) version (while I am no FDA fan, I think Mike Adams FDA criticisms on this salmonella case are a bit uncalled for).

It seems very rare in this country for rich and powerful white collar criminals to be held accountable for their crimes. In China, these criminals are held accountable (see, for example, Dairy Bosses Sentenced to Death over China Melamine Scandal). In the U.S. no one was held accountable for selling aids tainted blood overseas, but in the countries where this happened, the authorities involved were held accountable. We need to ensure that rich and powerful criminals are held accountable and that they don't get away with their crimes just because they are rich and powerful.
Post #: 85
RE: The FDA and health - 1/30/2009 3:28:45 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
Here is an update on the issue (you will have to read the article to fully understand the context since I would have to quote too much info for the entire context to be present here).

quote:


"The shipment was refused by FDA for filth," FDA spokeswoman Stephanie Kwisnek wrote in an e-mail to The Associated Press. "The importer requested to destroy the product." Another FDA spokesman, George Strait, said later Friday that metal fragments were found in the shipment.

"The FDA did everything appropriately in handling the activities associated with this shipment," Kwisnek said.
...
The chopped peanuts in the export case were prevented by the FDA from being allowed back into the United States because the peanuts contained an unspecified "filthy, putrid or decomposed substance, or is otherwise unfit for food," according to the FDA's report of the incident.

...Federal inspectors previously reported they found roaches, mold, a leaking roof and other sanitation issues at the company's processing plant in Blakely.
...
Members of Congress noted that the timing of the discovery of the adulterated peanuts came before the first clear signs of the salmonella outbreak that has sickened more than 500 people in the United States and may have killed at least eight...

"The FDA failing to follow up after this incident, does that mean that products that are not good enough for a foreign country are still good enough for the USA?" asked Senate Agriculture Committee Chairman Tom Harkin, D-Iowa. "That's a double standard that has deadly consequences for our citizens."
...
"Why was it able to get exported in the first place?" asked DeLauro, D-Conn. "That also begs the question, how many contaminated products are getting through our borders every single day? If the FDA discovered that there was an issue with this product inspection, why didn't they follow up on it? Why didn't they take a closer look at this facility?"


AP Exclusive: Peanuts tainted with metal fragments

I do think the FDA should have done much more to prevent this problem. Perhaps Mike Adams FDA criticisms are not uncalled for. At least it seems like the FDA has made some effort to prevent this (which maybe unusual because the FDA is usually too busy going after small powerless entities that sell herbs and dietary supplements). The point is that at least the FDA seems to be trying to do something about this, which I have to say is an improvement (but improvement is still needed).

< Message edited by Bettawrekonize -- 1/30/2009 3:35:05 PM >
Post #: 86
RE: The FDA and health - 1/31/2009 8:30:16 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:


The Washington Post's story about high fructose corn syrup containing mercury swept the Internet: In Environmental Health, researchers revealed mercury was detectable in nine out of 20 samples of commercial HFCS; separately, the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy discovered nearly one in three of 55 brand-name foods tested contained mercury.
...
It wasn't recognized that the mercury could contaminate the caustic soda -- until, according to the Institute for Ag and Trade Policy, "the lead author of the Environmental Health study, a longtime environmental investigator of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), thought to look into it."

Continues the institute: "What she found was that possible mercury contamination of these food chemicals was not common knowledge within the food industry ... Through this public scientist’s initiative, the FDA learned that commercial HFCS was contaminated with mercury. The agency has apparently done nothing to inform consumers of this fact, however, or to help change industry practice."


http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/food/dishing/2009/01/food_villain_of.html

quote:


IATP's Ben Lilliston also told HealthDay that the Environmental Health findings were based on information gathered by the FDA in 2005.


Study Finds High-Fructose Corn Syrup Contains Mercury

Apparently the FDA has known about this since 2005 and they seem to have done nothing about it. More examples of the FDA acting in the best interest of big business at the expense of the American people.
Post #: 87
RE: The FDA and health - 2/3/2009 2:51:03 AM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:


The FDA has approved 18 products for market from generic drug manufacturer Ranbaxy Laboratories, even though the company is currently being investigated by Congress for making substandard products and conspiring to fraudulently cover it up.


FDA Approves 18 Drugs from Pharma Company Accused of Conspiracy, Fraud

Makes one wonder how thorough these FDA approval reviews are. It wouldn't be the first time the FDA approved substandard products (and it probably won't be the last).
Post #: 88
RE: The FDA and health - 2/12/2009 7:35:32 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:


(NaturalNews) The FDA has effectively banned a naturally-occurring form of vitamin B6 called pyridoxamine by declaring it to be a drug, reports the American Association for Health Freedom. Responding to a petition filed by a drug company, the FDA declared pyridoxamine to be "a new drug."


FDA Declares Form of Vitamin B6 a Drug, Effectively Banning Pyridoxamine from Dietary Supplements

The FDA (and the patent office) need to stop acting in the best interest of rich and powerful entities, and they need to start acting in the best interest of the American people. The government has no right to take away our health freedoms like this just to help the rich and the powerful (and the notion that they're doing it for consumer safety is a lie).
Post #: 89
RE: The FDA and health - 2/16/2009 10:56:27 AM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:


Almost half of tested samples of commercial high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) contained mercury... Mercury was also found in nearly a third of 55 popular brand-name food and beverage products where HFCS is the first- or second-highest labeled ingredient.

HFCS has replaced sugar as the sweetener in many beverages and foods. A high consumer can take in about 20 teaspoons of HFCS per day. The chemical was found most commonly in HFCS-containing dairy products, dressings and condiments.


Most Common Source of Calories in U.S. is LOADED With Mercury!

Study Finds High-Fructose Corn Syrup Contains Mercury

Where is the FDA in all this? Oh, that’s right, they’re too busy banning safer products that compete with large corporations (ie: Stevia and vitamin B6) and enforcing those banishments. They have better things to do than to protect the welfare of the American people (ie: protecting the profit margins of large corporations).
Post #: 90
RE: The FDA and health - 2/17/2009 5:43:57 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:


MADISON, Wis. - Patients cannot sue the makers of potentially unsafe medical devices approved for sale by federal regulators, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled Tuesday.

The court ruled against a Wisconsin man who had surgery to remove a defibrillator after the manufacturer, Medtronic, Inc., warned its battery had a chance of failing.
...
But two justices warned the decision leaves Wisconsin residents at the mercy of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which has a poor track record of ensuring the safety of medical devices.
...
Joseph Blunt, Sr., 63, of St. Francis, had a Medtronic Marquis 7230 defibrillator implanted in 2004 to try to prevent his heart from failing.

The company warned the following year the devices' batteries might fail in one out of 10,000 patients, which could lead to a potentially fatal loss of power.
...
The company knew of the problem more than two years earlier but kept selling the product. The FDA did not order a recall or withdraw its 2002 approval. In the meantime, Medtronic obtained approval from the FDA in 2003 to also sell an identical device with fixed batteries.


Wis. Supreme Court tosses suit against Medtronic

Be aware of products approved by the FDA. If you get hurt, you probably can't be compensated. Companies may sell these products knowing that they're harmful and knowing that if they harm you, you probably won't be compensated. If anything, FDA approval gives companies incentive to sell more dangerous products since they know any harm they do will not get them in trouble. If a product has no FDA approved, companies have incentive to ensure its safety since any harm it does can cost the company a lot of money. If a product is FDA approved, the company could care less about ensuring that the product is safe and they may even manipulate the FDA to approve only the most dangerous products.

quote:


The ruling is a victory for Minneapolis-based Medtronic and other manufacturers who want to limit product liability.


Another victory for rich and powerful corporations. Another loss for the welfare of the American people. The courts have successfully protected the best interests of big businesses at the expense of the American people.
Post #: 91
RE: The FDA and health - 2/17/2009 6:06:15 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:


...the FDA actually allows a certain amount of contaminants in the food supply.

Bugs, mold, rodent hairs, and maggots are all okay if not found in big numbers.

The FDA says canned mushrooms, for example, may have "20 or more maggots of any size per 100 grams."

The next time you down a beer, keep in mind 10 grams of hops could have up to 2,500 plant lice.

CNN reports that peanut butter, the food that initiated the scrutiny, can actually contain about 145 bug parts for an 18 ounce jar.


FDA says some bugs, mold OK for foods

So much for the notion that the FDA actually does anything to protect the American people. They're too busy protecting the profit margins of rich and powerful corporations.

Also found this interesting

quote:


While Canada has already banned the substance, in the United States the FDA has been unwilling to recognize its dangers, relying on chemical industry data that ignores the mounting scientific evidence proving the dangers of BPA.


Toxic baby bottles

Because data that comes from the industry (and is hence subject to conflicts of interest) is the most reliable source for determining what's best for the American people (sarcasm).

It seems to be the job of the FDA to do everything in its power to protect the profit margins of rich and powerful corporations, even if it comes at the cost of the American people. The FDA is doing an excellent job.
Post #: 92
RE: The FDA and health - 2/17/2009 6:21:57 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:


Dr. Steven Nissen is the latest high-profile physician to join the pile-on over an FDA advisory panel's decision to exclude an outspoken critic of the antiplatelet drug prasugrel.
...
Nissen of the Cleveland Clinic, told HeartWire on WebMD's theheart.org, that “in science having a debate and dialogue is what it's all about, and that there is a value in having diversity in this sort of an FDA panel.” Nissen said a single individual is not going to dominate the thinking of a panel and that the exclusion threatens to undermine the credibility of the panel.
...
HeartWire reported that Dr. John Jenkins, the FDA director of the Office of New Drugs, said that on the Friday before the advisory panel hearing, the staff in the cardiovascular and renal division, in the course of their review, became aware of five abstracts presented by Kaul last year at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions and these analyses, although free from financial conflicts of interest, alerted staff to possible “intellectual bias.”


Backlash builds against prasugrel panel decision

So anyone that may criticize something that helps the profit margins of rich and powerful corporations is said to be "bias" and hence excluded from the decision making process even though they don't have conflicts of interest. Some that do have conflicts of interest might not be excluded because they're somehow not bias (ie: see post 44). Typical FDA logic, designed to protect the profit margins of the rich and the powerful at the expense of the American people.

< Message edited by Bettawrekonize -- 2/17/2009 6:28:05 PM >
Post #: 93
RE: The FDA and health - 2/17/2009 6:29:03 PM   
lightshineon


Posts: 1812
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
I do not trust the FDA much, I was part of a test study, the involved the date rape drug ghb. I hae narcolepsy, cataplexy and this was more than ten years ago. I did not know what it was, I was told it was a natural thing found in the body. I almost died, and my mind was effected for awhile. I quit the study, over ten years ago, and heard they approed the drug in 2001, I believe. I saw records being falseified, sleep diaries, and side-effects not recorded. I will never again do any study for a drug to be approved.

_____________________________

Remember, whenever you have pearls, there are always plenty of pigs nearby who would be glad to step on them.
F.T., 2007

Be sure you vote for those, whose views you want your children to emulate.
Post #: 94
RE: The FDA and health - 2/17/2009 6:45:12 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lightshineon
...I was part of a test study ... I hae narcolepsy, cataplexy...


I'm very sorry to hear this.

quote:


I saw records being falseified, sleep diaries, and side-effects not recorded.


and for anyone to say that this doesn't happen anymore is nonsense.

The problem is that too many people think science is performed in a vacuum, independent of politics. Science is not performed in a vacuum, science is performed by "scientists" who are people, people who are just as subject to politics as anyone else. This is why I give very little credence to these studies that allege things and I give more credence to the experience of honest people. It's exactly why we should trust honest experienced doctors over that of studies and clinical trials. Ones experience isn't going to lie to them and bias the results with politics (but of course you have to know that the doctor himself is honest).

For instance (as an above survey showed), most oncologists would refuse chemotherapy if they got cancer and the reasons they gave were that it's too toxic and too ineffective. That says a lot more than the potentially bias studies that try to testify to its effectiveness. These oncologists deal with cancer patients all the time and their collective knowledge is far more valid than these potential bias clinical trials. However, another thing one must realize is that these statistics themselves (about how many oncologists would refuse chemotherapy) are subject to politics and those giving the survey's could lie about how many oncologists would accept chemotherapy (one also has to also realize that there are few financial rewards for claiming that most oncologists would refuse chemotherapy, there are many for claiming the opposite, so the financial incentive is to bias such survey's towards saying that more oncologists would accept chemotherapy than is really the case).
Post #: 95
RE: The FDA and health - 2/18/2009 1:16:41 AM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
BTW, thanks for your insights lightshineon.

quote:


Pfizer Inc. could pay $153 million or more to the state of Wisconsin after a jury found a company it acquired artificially inflated prices for years, the state's attorney general said Tuesday.


Jury rules against Pfizer in Wisconsin lawsuit

Hopefully the ruling won't be overturned. When a big corporation does something wrong, they should be punished.

I also found this interesting.

Voting Himself Rich: CDC Vaccine Adviser Made $29 Million Or More After Using Role to Create Market

(both articles originally found on Naturalnews).
Post #: 96
RE: The FDA and health - 2/20/2009 12:55:50 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:


(NaturalNews) Without any fanfare, pharmaceutical companies have been raising the prices of many of their drugs by 100 percent or more, according to a study conducted by researchers from the University of Minnesota.

The researchers investigated cases in which drugs had their prices increased by 100 percent or more in a single cost adjustment, finding that drug companies had done so for 26 products in 2006. Questcor Pharmaceuticals, for example, increased the price of its drug Acthar (used to treat spasms in infants) by 1,424 percent, from $1,650 per vial to a whopping $23,000.


Big Pharma Quietly Hikes Drug Prices 100 Percent or More

Isn't our whole intellectual property system supposed to result in better products at a cheaper price. So far, that's not what it's doing.
Post #: 97
RE: The FDA and health - 2/20/2009 9:04:46 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:


As Jenkins told heartwire last week, members are welcome to bring differing perspectives and to ask tough questions, "But at the same time, we want the committee members to come to the table with an open mind, so they can give us advice based on the data, the presentations, and the discussions that are held at the committee meeting itself."


http://www.theheart.org/article/943511.do

So, how do we know that the data given at the committee itself isn't bias? These are the people responsible for taking away our health freedoms and deciding how we can and can't maintain ourselves and yet they proceed with very poor logic (well, it's very good logic if their objective is to maximize the profit margins of large corporations, but it's terrible logic if their objective is to maximize the health and welfare of the American people).
Post #: 98
RE: The FDA and health - 2/21/2009 10:57:16 PM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:


Federal legislation designed to nullify a controversial U.S. Supreme Court decision granting companies that make heart defibrillators, stints, and other approved medical devices total immunity from state personal injury liability lawsuits is expected to be introduced soon, national leaders said.

Separate bills forming in the U.S. Congress and Senate would once again give plaintiffs the right to sue medical-device makers for injuries, even when the Food and Drug Administration has approved the devices which caused the injuries.


New Laws to Reinstate Suits for Injuries Caused by Defective Medical Devices Expected Soon

Finally, congress might do something right for a change. When people buy products from a store they don't expect to buy defected products. The deal is I buy this product and it should work. That's the agreement (the person agreed to pay X dollars and the company agreed to give that person a functional product. Otherwise, why would the person agree to pay?). If the company you bought a product from sells you a defected product, they broke their end of the agreement. We should not reward companies that break their end of the agreement by selling defected products. Does anyone see anything unbiblical about this, because I don't.

It's sad that congress has to fix the problems that the FDA is causing. The FDA is supposed to protect the American people from dangerous products. Not only has the FDA failed to protect the American people, but now we need Congress to protect the American people from the FDA because the FDA is fixated on serving corporate interests over those of the American people. Why even have an FDA? We don't need an FDA that fails to protect us and then prevents the courts from protecting us. They are practically causing more harm than good.

< Message edited by Bettawrekonize -- 2/21/2009 11:45:18 PM >
Post #: 99
RE: The FDA and health - 2/23/2009 10:00:04 AM   
Bettawrekonize

 

Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
quote:


(NaturalNews) The FDA has little ability to police illegal marketing of drugs for unapproved uses, a report from the federal Government Accountability Office (GAO) has warned. This means that an illegal and potentially dangerous practice that is believed to be widespread is going essentially unregulated.

"[The FDA] isn't keeping track of how drugs are marketed for off-label use, even though marketing for off-label use is illegal and it's the FDA's job to enforce that law," said Sen. Charles Grassley, who commissioned the report. "As a result, drug makers aren't being held accountable for promoting unapproved use of medicine, and patient safety is diminished."


http://www.naturalnews.com/025698.html

The FDA is too busy policing poor and powerless entities that compete with big pharmaceutical corporations (ie: anyone that sells vitamin B6, herbs, dietary supplements, etc... (ie: red yeast rice) to help people's health). They don't police the rich and the powerful, they are controlled by the rich and the powerful. The FDA's unfair double standard against the poor and the powerless never ceases to amaze me (but this doesn't surprise me). The FDA; for the corporations, by the corporations.


quote:


Federal law prohibits pharmaceutical companies from marketing a drug to either consumers or doctors for a use that has not been specifically approved by the FDA - also known as an "off label" use.


But of course, the FDA doesn't care about Federal law, they are too busy doing everything in their power to protect the profit margins of rich and powerful corporations.
Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [General] >> Current Events >> RE: The FDA and health
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



  Forum Tools
Forums  | Register | Login

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List | 


Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI