|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login | |
|
RE: The FDA and health - 4/18/2009 1:45:52 PM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: shakezula people need to decide how much this matters to them. at face value, we all want safe food. but the kind of oversight you want will cost huge bucks. What we want is for the FDA and governmental officials to be held accountable for the atrocities they commit. It shouldn't cost that much to put these people in jail. This isn't a cost issue, the solution is not to spend more money funding criminal behavior. Huge pharmaceutical corporations (and big business) are the ones creating these conflicts of interest and if we allow them to be held unaccountable for their crimes that will just mean they will create more conflicts of interest (causing more distortion of data and burying of important information), knowing that if their products hurt people they will be held unaccountable. If they can easily escape accountability then what incentive do they have to be honest? They're already dishonest enough as it is, why should we make it easier for them to escape accountability? Again, this isn't a cost issue, increasing criminal funds is not the solution. quote:
i think people should sign a waver. What we need is more accountability, not less. These people, for the most part, are held unaccountable for the crimes they commit. They fabricate data and bury inconvenient data for the purpose of increasing profits. That needs to change. The issue has little to do with a lack of funding (these people make huge profits), it's an issue of too many conflicts of interest among governmental officials. Giving criminals more money doesn't solve anything, holding them accountable is the solution. Funding people who distort data and lie to us is not the solution. If you allow these people to be held unaccountable for their crimes they will simply commit more crimes (and murder more people and ruin the lives of more people). The lack of accountability is exactly what the problem is, not the other way around. quote:
if we know a drug was hurried out to market, the drug company must let that be known. This isn't an issue of drugs being hurried out to market, it's an issue of deliberately distorting and burying data. There is no reason why drugs can't be "hurried out to market" without deliberately distorting and burying data. Again, the solution is not to increase the funding of these people who distort the data, it's to put these people in jail. These people need to be held accountable. As obvious as this is many on these forums still try to protect the atrocities committed by big business and then they turn around and claim that they care for humanity. But it's OK for them to take away our health freedoms by banning safer and more effective products (ie: red yeast rice containing more than trace amounts of lovastatin) because those products compete with the profit margins of rich and powerful corporations. But then corporations should be allowed to introduce more dangerous drugs that hurt people and be held completely unaccountable (if they sign a waiver) so long as those drugs increase profits. But in the case of red yeast rice, which is shown to be safer and more effective, people shouldn't have a right to "sign a waiver" and take the stuff. They are allowed to put their own health at risk when it comes to drugs that increase pharmaceutical profits (even cigarettes, which have killed millions and serve virtually no medicinal purpose), but when it comes to safer, more effective products that compete with profits, they are not allowed to. The hypocrisy. quote:
btw, there was a report that came out a while ago about the study that started the autism/vaccine scare. turns out the data was forged. What was fabricated was the study showing there was no link.
< Message edited by Bettawrekonize -- 4/18/2009 2:05:14 PM >
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 4/18/2009 2:26:02 PM
|
|
|
shakezula
Posts: 934
Joined: 3/9/2009
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Bettawrekonize What was fabricated was the study showing there was no link. http://www.livescience.com/common/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1029 "In his paper, Dr. Wakefield claimed that 8 of 12 families of autistic children who attended the clinic at his hospital began to show signs of the illness immediately after getting the "jab" -- the British name for the MMR vaccine. In the paper, he claimed that the measles virus infected the children's bowels, giving them inflammatory bowel disease, which in turn triggered the autism. However, the Sunday Times of London found a far different story. Investigative reporter Brian Deer, who has been covering the story since its start, found that hospital and other records showed signs that the children were already developing autism before they had received any injection. And while that difference might be attributable to innocent oversight, the newspaper discovered even more shocking allegations. According to Mr. Deer, the physicians working under Dr. Wakefield were unable to find signs of inflammatory bowel disease in many of the children, but Dr. Wakefield ordered his team to falsify the data to indicate they had. Furthermore, one of the children deemed to have the condition was taken by a parent to three other labs which were unable to find signs of the illness."
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 4/18/2009 2:33:07 PM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: shakezula http://www.livescience.com/common/forums/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=1029 "In his paper, Dr. Wakefield claimed that 8 of 12 families of autistic children who attended the clinic at his hospital began to show signs of the illness immediately after getting the "jab" -- the British name for the MMR vaccine. In the paper, he claimed that the measles virus infected the children's bowels, giving them inflammatory bowel disease, which in turn triggered the autism. However, the Sunday Times of London found a far different story. Investigative reporter Brian Deer, who has been covering the story since its start, found that hospital and other records showed signs that the children were already developing autism before they had received any injection. And while that difference might be attributable to innocent oversight, the newspaper discovered even more shocking allegations. According to Mr. Deer, the physicians working under Dr. Wakefield were unable to find signs of inflammatory bowel disease in many of the children, but Dr. Wakefield ordered his team to falsify the data to indicate they had. Furthermore, one of the children deemed to have the condition was taken by a parent to three other labs which were unable to find signs of the illness." Thanks for the link. What I was referring to was the study by the CDC and the FDA. I'm not claiming vaccines cause autism and I'm not claiming they don't. However, the solution is not less accountability, it's more. The problem is that these criminals aren't held accountable for their crimes. Also found this interesting. “Leading” Scientific Experts for Vaccine-Mercury-Autism Connection Disqualified by Court for Lack of Expertise http://neurodiversity.com/weblog/article/140/
< Message edited by Bettawrekonize -- 4/18/2009 2:44:35 PM >
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 4/18/2009 5:23:42 PM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) plans to break its promise to American consumers to timely upgrade the animal feed ban designed to protect U.S. consumers and the U.S. cattle herd against the heightened risk of bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE, or mad cow disease). FDA Plans to Break Food Safety Promise to America quote:
On April 9, FDA published a special filing in the Federal Register giving the public only seven days to comment on the agency's plans to delay the scheduled April 27, 2009, implementation of its upgraded BSE feed ban. ... One year ago, the FDA issued a news release touting its promise to upgrade the U.S. feed ban by stating, "FDA Strengthens Safeguards for Consumers of Beef," and informing consumers that the new feed ban would become effective on April 27, 2009, after allowing time for the industry to adapt its practices to the new requirements. Industry gets a whole year to comment but the public gets only a week. It should be obvious that the FDA is here to serve industry, not the public (and the only reason the FDA would give the public a week to comment is because laws require them to give some time for us to comment, despite the fact that the FDA simply ignores public concerns and comments).
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 4/20/2009 10:48:27 PM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
The woman, Deborah Fellner, said Tri-Union Seafoods LLC, the maker of Chicken of the Sea brand tuna, failed to warn her of the risks of consuming tuna fish. ... A federal trial judge had tossed Fellner's lawsuit, but an appeals court in Philadelphia reinstated it, saying the FDA had taken no regulatory action that preempted her legal claims. The Supreme Court rejected Tri-Union's request that it review the case. Instead, the justices let the lower court ruling stand without comment. ... Among other things, the company pointed to a 2005 letter the FDA sent former California Attorney General Bill Lockyer, who was attempting to sue Tri-Union for not placing a warning label on its products. The FDA told Lockyer that such warning labels were preempted by federal law. The agency said it had analyzed the issue for several years and decided not to require mercury warning labels on seafood products. http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20090420-709427.html http://www.lloyds.com/CmsPhoenix/DowJonesArticle.aspx?id=427028 Notice how it is the courts, and not the FDA, protecting us. In fact, it seems that the FDA is part of the problem, not the solution. Also found these links interesting How Big Pharma Distorts Science to Get FDA Approval for Dangerous Drugs Drugmakers Boost Lobbying to Police Drug Comparisons The Mother's Act - Mandatory Screening of Moms for Depression is Like a Bad Movie Rerun
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 4/20/2009 11:17:19 PM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
Though Westco/Westcott had no comment for SN, an ABC News published report revealed that Moradi had the peanuts tested at an FDA-approved lab and all came back negative for contamination. Since the financial repercussions of recalling product would put him out of business, he sought proof from the FDA that whole redskin peanuts roasted in oil have led to illness. But to no avail. “For seven years, they did not do inspections [at the PCA plant in Georgia] and now at the cost of a tiny little small business they are coming, and they are forcing me and they have no proof,” Moradi told ABC. http://supermarketnews.com/viewpoints/recall-authority-allow-0420/ (btw, I think the FDA should generally have very little authority to recall very small companies that could easily be put out of business by such recalls). So basically, this business buys peanuts from peanut corp. Peanut corp is responsible for selling infected peanuts but the FDA does virtually nothing to stop peanut corp from selling bad food (ie: no inspections, etc...). Instead, the FDA picks on a tiny little business that bought peanuts from peanut corp and, with little evidence to substantiate its actions, tries to recall its peanuts, an action that would practically put this business out of business. The FDA does virtually nothing to regulate peanut corp and to prevent them from selling bad food but then they go and pick on tiny little businesses to put them out of business for no reason. If this isn't evidence enough that the FDA is here to serve the rich and the powerful, and not the American people, then I don't know what is. The big corporations are the ones responsible for selling bad food and a little business gets picked on for it. But the FDA wouldn't dare challenge a big corporation like Peanut Corp (who could get away with virtually anything and be held unaccountable). What a bunch of jerks.
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 4/21/2009 12:11:16 PM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
A follow up on the Stevia issue. quote:
A December 2008 press release from the Center for Science in the Public Interest, or CSPI, noted that the Food and Drug Adminstration's midnight decision to give the go-ahead for rebaudioside A, a sweetener extracted from the herb stevia, was "President Bush's parting gift to the soda industry." Stevia consternation: Sweetener's FDA approval hasn't ended safety controversy The FDA decides to outlaw Stevia (preventing small businesses and individuals from using it and even taking cookbooks with it as an ingredient) until some big corporation attained a patent on a Stevia extract. Only then does the FDA say it's safe. Politics as usual (and not science).
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 4/29/2009 12:06:10 PM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
An update on post 129. FDA ruling hits area animal agriculture So the FDA didn't ignore public concerns and comments on this one after all. quote:
State law requires farmers to dispose of dead animals through an approved method within 48 hours of death. These methods include incineration, boiling or steaming, burying, removal by a licensed rendering establishment, disposition in a contained landfill or composting according to information from the University of Kentucky College of Agriculture. I thought prions aren't affected much by things like heat, so how would boiling make much of a difference?
< Message edited by Bettawrekonize -- 4/29/2009 12:19:06 PM >
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 5/1/2009 3:06:12 AM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
Pediatricians had petitioned the FDA to impose a ban on the use of cold-and-cough drugs in children under the age of six, citing lack of scientific evidence that the products work at all in children, as well as a high risk of adverse effects. Advocates of such a measure point to studies finding that 7,000 children in the United States visit emergency rooms every year due to cold-and-cough drug overdoses. An independent panel commissioned by the FDA to review the doctors' suggestion concluded that the recommendation was sound and should be adopted as a rule by the agency. Instead, the FDA ignored both groups and came up with a new rule. The agency claims that its conclusions were based on a review of emergency room data on cold-and-cough overdoses in children, but it has refused to release the data it used in its analysis. "There was no data suggesting that the drugs were effective in kids under 12," objected FDA advisory panel member Sean Hennessy of University of Pennsylvania. "I don't see how [the new policy is] a fully rational approach to the problem." FDA Conspires with Cold Medicine Manufacturers to Keep Selling Dangerous Products to Four Year Olds quote:
On the Friday before Monday's air date, Monsanto's lawyer faxed a letter to Roger Ailes, the head of Fox News in New York, claiming that the series was biased and unscientific. It threatened, "There is a lot at stake in what is going on in Florida, not only for Monsanto, but also for Fox News and its owner." Rupert Murdoch, of course is the owner, and part of what was at stake was lots of Monsanto advertising dollars--for the Florida station, the entire Fox network, and Murdoch's Actmedia, a major advertising agency used by Monsanto. Fox pulled the series for "further review." After the Florida station's general manager, who had a background in investigative reporting, meticulously vetted the show, he verified that every statement was accurate and unbiased. The station re-scheduled the series for the following week. Monsanto's attorney immediately sent another, more strongly worded letter to Ailes, this time indicating that the news story "could lead to serious damage to Monsanto and dire consequences for Fox News." The airing was postponed indefinitely. The Florida station's general manager and news manager were soon fired, and according to Wilson, the new general manager was a salesman with no news experience. Wilson tried to convince him to run the rbGH story on its merits. He said Monsanto's whole PR campaign was based on the false statement that milk from rbGH-treated cows is "the same safe wholesome product we've always known." But even Monsanto's own studies showed this to be a lie, and it could be endangering the public. Monsanto Forced Fox TV to Censor Coverage of Dangerous Milk Drug Just goes to show you who runs the media. Big corporations run the news media and it is based on profits, not truth. Our media is corrupt, but I'm just a crazy conspiracy theorist who doesn't know any better.
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 5/3/2009 2:56:43 AM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
A prominent Massachusetts anesthesiologist allegedly fabricated 21 medical studies that claimed to show benefits from painkillers like Vioxx and Celebrex, according to the hospital where he worked. ... Dr. Reuben had been a paid speaker on behalf of Pfizer's medicines, and it paid for some of his research. Top Pain Scientist Fabricated Data in Studies, Hospital Says But we all know how reliable industry (funded) studies are and how little conflicts of interest affect research results.
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 5/4/2009 12:07:22 AM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
Just last week the FDA’s Dietary Supplement program manager told Expo West, to paraphrase his statement, “that FDA is about to receive much more money and will be able to saturate the field with inspectors… a large increase in our force out there… largest supplements firms shouldn’t have a problem funding, but some mom and pop operations will be lost… recommends that small firms band together so the new rules don’t break their backs… “ http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/?page_id=2002 More evidence that our government is fixated on promoting the interests of the rich and the powerful at the expense of everyone else. Obama should not give the FDA more authority, they cause enough harm with the authority they already have. Bigger government hindering poor and powerless entities is not the solution. You know the scam behind all these regulations A: They probably won't be enforced against rich and powerful entities as much (since rich and powerful entities are more able to hide their actions and defend themselves and create conflicts of interest within government so that government can look the other way). B: Once all the small mom and pop shops go out of business and the rich and powerful entities have practically monopolized everything, the regulations (and court interpretations) will probably be relaxed in the name of free markets (since monopolies naturally have barriers to entry so once a few rich and powerful entities control everything it's more difficult for any new players to enter the industry).
< Message edited by Bettawrekonize -- 5/4/2009 12:22:05 AM >
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 5/4/2009 1:15:06 PM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
Free Prozac was sent to people in Florida -- unsolicited -- in an attempt to get them started on the drug, according to Associated Press report below. ... S.K.'s sample Prozac was an attempt by Lilly to switch patients to a new variety of the brand-name drug because the patent for Prozac taken daily had expired, Farmer said. The drug now is available in a cheaper, generic copy. Floridians Get Prozac Samples in the Mail
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 5/7/2009 1:52:50 PM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
An update on the whole Harvard issue. quote:
The student movement has had at least one victory so far, with the school agreeing to require all professors and lecturers to tell students of any financial ties to the drug industry. In one case, a professor was required to disclose 47 financial relationships. A full 1,600 of 8,900 teachers have reported at least one financial relationship in an area related to their teaching, research or medical practice. Harvard Medical School Professors are Paid Big Bucks by Big Pharma to Push Meds Well, at least we're headed in the right direction, but MUCH work still needs to be done. quote:
Other student demands, however, have met more resistance. Harvard does not own its affiliated teaching hospitals, for example, making it harder to impose regulations on them. Also found this interesting. FDA Floats Hydroxycut Scare to Discredit Yet Another Supplement Company
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 5/13/2009 12:03:02 PM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
For years, we've been among those who have questioned how the hell anyone (let alone the US Patent Office) can justify the concept of patenting genes. Yet, the Patent Office has continued to issue such patents, even as they have been shown to cause significant problems in diagnosing and treating certain illnesses. Finally, however, it appears that the concept of patenting genes is about to get tested in court. ACLU, Cancer Patients Sue Over Patenting Of Genes More examples of how our modern intellectual property system only hinders innovation and harms society. Nothing that was patented was "innovative" it was simply stolen from nature and intellectual property prevents anyone from doing anything with it.
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 5/13/2009 6:44:11 PM
|
|
|
its_GO_time
Posts: 546
Status: offline
|
In FDA related news: "Ask your doctor, whether Cheerios are right for you" From the article:"The FDA took issue with Cheerios boxes that say the cereal can lower cholesterol. That statement qualifies Cheerios under U.S. regulations as an unapproved new drug, the FDA said." I wonder what the co-pay will be? As Elton John said in a song once "we've all gone crazy lately"
_____________________________
"I believe the very heart and soul of conservatism is libertarianism." -Ronald Reagan
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 5/13/2009 10:53:15 PM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
So if I sell water with the claim that it prevents dehydration, am I selling a drug? Does it need to be FDA regulated as a drug?
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 5/16/2009 1:56:48 AM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
I found this interesting. Pills That Monitor If You Took Them and this quote:
On June 6, 2007 the New York Times revealed a stunning event that occurred in March of 2006 wherein FDA safety supervisor Dr. Rosemary Johann-Liang approved a black box warning on Avandia to warn about the risk for congestive heart failure. The von Eschenbach team ordered her to retract her approval of the warning. She was then stripped of her power to make such warnings and removed from supervision of the safety of Avandia. What Does it Take to Get a Black Box Warning? and this quote:
Second, researchers lied about the number of people tested. Eli Lilly, the manufacturer, claims that thousands of people received Prozac in controlled clinical trials during its testing phase. In actuality, the numbers were far lower, since those who failed to complete the studies due to negative side effects were never accounted for. FDA material, derived via the Freedom of Information Act, shows that up to 50% of the test patients dropped out of the studies because of serious side effects. In his book,28 Dr. Breggin reports that, in the final analysis, only 286 people were used as a basis for Prozac's approval. Significantly, Lilly has never challenged this information. "They've had me under oath in court," Breggin says, "and they haven't contested a single word that I've written in the book."14 http://www.sntp.net/null1.htm
< Message edited by Bettawrekonize -- 5/16/2009 2:03:12 AM >
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 5/23/2009 1:37:00 AM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
Here is a video explaining the concerns of many scientists around the world (who wrote a letter) complaining about Monsanto's efforts to prevent anyone from studying the effects of their genetically modified products on our health and on the environment and to publish those results in peer review journals without Monsanto's prior permission. http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=192541 This, of course, is absurd, and helps demonstrate how much intellectual property costs society. Scientists should be allowed to study such effects and publish the results without Monsanto's prior permission. Also found this interesting. quote:
...a new analysis by University of Michigan (U-M) Comprehensive Cancer Center researchers just published in the online version of the journal CANCER, a peer-reviewed journal of the American Cancer Society, found that a very large number of clinical cancer studies published in well-known medical journals have financial connections to pharmaceutical companies. Most importantly, the study flat out concludes that conflicts of interest may cause some researchers to report results that are biased to be favorable to Big Pharma companies. http://www.naturalnews.com/026314.html
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 5/23/2009 2:40:58 PM
|
|
|
drnick
Posts: 89
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
|
You'll love this one: The FDA has ruled that clinical trials performed outside the USA don't have to be as well regulated as those done IN the US if the results are used to support applications for registration of products IN the US. Practically it means that there is no longer a moral or ethical code covering these trials as far as the FDA are concerned, just a description of procedures. So if a company want to experiment the populations of poor countries, it is easier to do, and in fact they can get away with a far lower level of consent that would be demanded in the US (or Europe). This has led to deaths in the past (and lawsuits, eg. a meningitis antibiotic trial in Nigeria using children done by Pfizer - some died, some were damaged). Not good.
_____________________________
Who needs new music. Everyone knows Rock attained perfection in 1974. -- Homer Simpson
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 5/24/2009 3:34:48 AM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: drnick You'll love this one: The FDA has ruled that clinical trials performed outside the USA don't have to be as well regulated as those done IN the US if the results are used to support applications for registration of products IN the US. Practically it means that there is no longer a moral or ethical code covering these trials as far as the FDA are concerned, just a description of procedures. So if a company want to experiment the populations of poor countries, it is easier to do, and in fact they can get away with a far lower level of consent that would be demanded in the US (or Europe). This has led to deaths in the past (and lawsuits, eg. a meningitis antibiotic trial in Nigeria using children done by Pfizer - some died, some were damaged). Not good. I heard/read about this somewhere. They do studies on poor nations because it's much cheaper and they don't have to worry as much about getting sued if they screw things up and ruin peoples lives (and cause deaths). Then who benefits? The U.S. , we benefit at their expense. I agree, it is sad.
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 5/27/2009 7:08:13 PM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
children who get the flu vaccine are more at risk for hospitalization than their peers who do not get the vaccine, according to new research that will be presented on May 19, at the 105th International Conference of the American Thoracic Society in San Diego. ... They found that children who had received the flu vaccine had three times the risk of hospitalization, as compared to children who had not received the vaccine. In asthmatic children, there was a significantly higher risk of hospitalization in subjects who received the TIV, as compared to those who did not (p= 0.006). Study: Children Who Get Flu Vaccine Have 3 Times Risk of Hospitalization For Flu
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 6/3/2009 8:48:50 PM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
...The FDA has, without officially announcing any change in procedure, basically dropped the practice of inspecting the labs that carry out the first wave of tests on new medical devices, according to a report by the nonprofit organization The Project on Government Oversight. ... The inspections in question are those carried out at labs that conduct the earliest tests on new medical devices, a category that includes internal devices such as stents, external devices such as breast pumps, and diagnostic devices such as thermometers and magnetic imaging machines. While all devices must eventually be tested on humans before receiving FDA approval, they must also undergo a battery of other tests before they get to that stage. According to documents reviewed by the project, the FDA conducted 33 inspections of these early testing labs in 2005, seven in 2007 and one in 2008. None are schedule for 2009 FDA Covertly Drops Inspection of Medical Device Labs also found this interesting quote:
(NaturalNews) Dr. Paul Offit of the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) received at least $29 million from his share of royalties for Merck's Rotateq vaccine after using his position with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to ensure that childhood vaccination with the vaccine became compulsory. ... According to a report on the Web site "Age of Autism," a review of CHOP's royalties schedules reveals that Offit likely received between $29 million and $55 million for his work developing the Rotateq vaccine for rotavirus, which causes diarrhea in infants. Because the vaccine is jointly owned by CHOP and by the Wistar Institute but Offit is the only inventor listed on the patent from CHOP, he received 100 percent of inventor's rights payments from CHOP. ... While a member of the ACIP, Offit consistently voted in favor of making vaccination against rotavirus part of the compulsory U.S. childhood immunization schedule. He also voted to rescind recommendation of Wyeth's competing vaccine RotaShield, while aggressively advocating for the idea that other rotavirus vaccines would be less dangerous. CDC Vaccine Advisor Pockets $29 Million Promoting Vaccines But of course, we all know that politics and conflicts of interest do not play a role at the FDA and CDC and such. It's all driven by honest people doing honest research. BTW, notice that this person will probably not be punished for his conflicts of interest. quote:
"Unlike most other patented products, the market for mandated childhood vaccines is created not by consumer demand, but by the recommendation of an appointed body called the ACIP," Olmsted and Blaxill write. "In a single vote, ACIP can create a commercial market for a new vaccine that is worth hundreds of millions of dollars in a matter of months." More examples of how our patent system causes corruption (as already mentioned before).
< Message edited by Bettawrekonize -- 6/3/2009 9:21:05 PM >
|
|
|
|
RE: The FDA and health - 6/29/2009 3:11:06 PM
|
|
|
Bettawrekonize
Posts: 1156
Joined: 4/17/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
Inspection reports from a Nestlé USA cookie dough factory released yesterday show the company declined several times in the past five years to provide Food and Drug Administration inspectors with complaint logs, pest-control records and other information. The records, which date to 2004, were made public after Nestlé's Toll House refrigerated, prepackaged cookie dough was discovered to be the likely culprit in an E. coli outbreak that has sickened 69 people in 29 states, according to the latest estimates from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nestlé Refused FDA Records Requests It's amazing how rich and powerful entities can evade FDA enforcement for several years without punishment but a poor and powerless entity would probably be forced to comply with the FDA quickly and would probably face severe punishment.
|
|
|
|
New Messages |
No New Messages |
Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
Locked w/ New Messages |
Locked w/o New Messages |
|
Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|