|
benelchi -> RE: Is Sex Before Marriage Wrong... and what saith the Scriptures? (2/6/2009 12:54:24 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Ross.Lang This is not a post in support of premarital sex, but I think I can provide some insight into where the post might have come from, having struggled with this question in my own relationship. Here are some things to consider: 1. The first, and the biggest, is that the Church had nothing to do with the institution of marriage for centuries. Marriage was a pact beween individuals that the state recognized in taxes and land holdings, and the early Christians added to it the Israelite notion of a pact before God. Notice that this pact, this pact, and only this pact had anything to do with the Christian covenant of Marriage from the time of Christ until the dark ages. You will find no stories of Apostles or Elders marrying people in the NT, because it never happened. Want to get married? Your families agree, you get down on your knees together and you say "I take this woman as you took the Church," "I take this man as the Church clings to Christ." Congrats, your yes is yes, your no is no, and you are married for life. The $10,000 pagentry, $1,000-5,000 rings and the huge church service officiated by a minister is totally alien to Christian marriage by NT standards. The bible is clear that pacts of truth (oaths are forbidden in all cases) are made on the basis of a person's internal relationship with God. Therefore, no minister or witness is needed. God judges the hearts of men. While the above information is accurate, I do submit that most parishioners who present it to me from their research went and dug up info to suit their own desires, not the other way around. Sorry, but all of the historical information we have stands in direct contradiction to what you have proposed. Not only do we have descriptions of the Wedding ceremony numerous times in Scripture, but the Mishnah outlines the requirements that must be met for the marriage covenant in first century Judaism, and the practice of marriage in the early church mirrored almost identically the Jewish wedding. Even Jesus first miracle was at a wedding. And it is historically well know that the ring today is a modern version of the dowry spoken of in biblical and extra biblical literature. Weddings in the bible were as much a community celebration as they are today. In the 4th Century Augustin specifically addressed the "false doctrine" that a marriage could exist without a covenant in his letter to faustus the manichæan. In arguing against the idea that all oaths were forbidden he uses the example of the oath a witness to a crime takes before the courts when he gives his testimony. quote:
2. The theology of marriage propagated in most conservative circles is about as ethically sound as the holocaust (unlike the first part, which was just historical insight, this is something I really do hate). The Josh Harris/John Eldridge argument most typically given goes like this: if you have sex before you get married, you transgress scripture (good so far) and you also are sleeping with someone else’s spouse! The second part is the problem. For background, I’ve been dating my Fiancée for 5 years, and we are engaged to be married in June. I have never dated anyone else, loved anyone else, planned to marry anyone else. The problem with the second argument is that it gives people asymptotic justification for sin (as you get closer and closer to the wedding date, the validity of the assumption that you will not wed approaches zero). Why not hop into bed the night before the wedding? The week before? Don’t try to justify the word of God with cute logical analogies, because they break down. Provided we don’t die and Christ stays his return until June, does that mean I could have slept with my girlfriend at any time during the 5 year period and not done anything wrong? I think the issue here is that first, the bible declares the action to be sinful, period. Outside of marriage their is no biblical justification for sex. Second, even though the issue approaches "zero", as you put it, as the wedding night approaches, it does not become "zero" until there is a wedding. If one is so absolutely sure that the wedding will take place that they believe that have a right to the privileges of marriage then why not move up the date?
|
|
|
|